North American Vortex Authority (NAVA)

Charter & Operating Codes — Operational (v6.13)

Founded 2011 in the aftermath of the Blue Field Incident to coordinate standards, ethics, and communications among recognized vortex sites across North America. This Charter recognizes site sovereignty while establishing shared guardrails for safety, ethics, and public trust.

SCOPE: 19 member vortices (“Sites”). Largest and anchor site: Peeples–Rowd Vortex. NAVA functions as a coordinating body (not a government; not law enforcement).

North American Vortex Authority (Provisional)

CIRCULAR 01-01
Subject: Rule One — No Gnome Presence (NGP) on Recognized Vortex Properties
Adopted: June 23, 2013
Effective: Upon receipt

1) Purpose

In response to the Arcata-area “Blue Field” fatalities and the absence of unified standards, this circular establishes Rule One (NGP) for all properties recognized by the North American Vortex Authority (NAVA, provisional).

2) Scope

Applies to all recognized vortex properties, affiliated outbuildings, and managed buffer zones. Private, unaffiliated parcels operating as de-facto vortex sites are subject to compliance as a condition of recognition.

3) Definitions (operational)

• Sprugget (Pre-G): Subsurface ectoplasmic formation capable of maturing into a gnome.

• Gnome (Class G Aggregate): Post-threshold ectoplasmic mass exhibiting autonomous movement and attention-responsive behavior.

• Zenching: Ritualized attention practices intended to stimulate gnome activity.

4) Rule One (NGP)

4.1 Prohibition. No Gnome Presence is permitted on any recognized vortex property.
4.2 Prevention. Properties must (a) identify sprugget windows, (b) harvest pre-threshold, or (c) divert pre-threshold flow to designated off-property sinks.
4.3 Eradication Authority. Any gnome discovered on-property is designated a Class G Hazard and subject to lethal remediation without delay. Authorized methods include Loom-class interventions (e.g., Bridger Loom) configured for kill mode.
4.4 Activity Ban. Zenching and intentional cultivation of gnomes are prohibited on or adjacent to recognized properties.

5) Reporting & Compliance

Within 24 hours of any Class G detection or remediation, sites must file a Form G-1 Incident Report with witness statements, field maps, and method specifications. Failure to report constitutes non-compliance.

6) Transitional Carve-Outs (Limited)

6.1 PR-Lake Hole Quarantine (Peeples–Rowd).
Recognizing pre-existing conditions, NAVA grants a limited, grandfathered quarantine for gnome aggregates currently contained within the existing lake-bed “hole” at the Peeples–Rowd property, under the following terms:

• Containment remains in-lake only; no relocation or propagation.

• No zenching, no visitation, no study access beyond essential safety checks.

• Physical perimeter and signage maintained; independent audit quarterly by a non-resident inspector.

• An approved emergency kill plan (Loom-class) on file and ready.

• Status reviewed each quarter; NAVA may revoke upon any deviation or risk escalation.

No other exceptions are recognized at this time.

7) Enforcement

Non-compliance may result in suspension of recognition, access restrictions, and mandatory external remediation at the site’s expense.

8) Rationale (record)

Blue Field establishes that gnome aggregates, when cultivated or unmanaged, present non-controllable risk to practitioners and the public. While interpretations of gnome ontology differ, operational control is the governing standard.

Appendix A — Minority Statement (Empath Caucus)

The Empath Caucus records formal dissent to Sections 4.1 and 4.3, asserting that certain gnomes exhibit non-hostilebehaviors and that categorical eradication forecloses ethical study and coexistence models. The Caucus proposes supervised off-property sanctuaries in lieu of lethal remediation. (Recorded; rule remains in force.)

Appendix B — Notes on Authorized Methods

• Loom-class interventions must be certified for kill mode and documented (wiring diagrams, line plans, node frequencies, operator logs).

• Bridger Loom deployments configured by Arlotto at Blue Field are adopted as the reference specification for lethal remediation.

Issued by:
Yeira Peeples
Founding Chair (Provisional), North American Vortex Authority

Attested:
Office of Records, NAVA (Provisional)

Distribution: All recognized vortex sites; provisional applicants; county liaison offices.

_____________________________________

Article I — Purpose & Intent

I.1 Safeguard human life, beings and the integrity of vortex sites.

I.2 Reduce internal/external panic and misinformation through consistent protocols and careful narrative management.

I.3 Promote ethical practice across roles (Empaths, Healers, Enticers, Archivists, Wardens, etc.).

I.4 Respect Site Sovereignty while enabling cross-site learning and mutual aid.

Article II — Definitions (operational, intentionally narrow)

“Sprugget”: Root-like precursor; lifecycle details contested; not governed here except where it implicates gnome contact.

“Haunting”: Period of sustained anomalous activity impacting health/safety or site operation.

“feshp”: Glass-panel diagnostic instrument operated by Empaths.

“Bridger Loom”: Large field rig used to dry/disperse goo. Capable of collateral harm to beings at aggressive settings. Regulated, not banned by NAVA; local policy varies.

“Consent-by-Behavior”: A being’s lowered resonance/approach allowing proximity; no verbal consent expected.

“Enticer”: Practitioner whose presence and controlled cues exacerbate/activate phenomena; not a reader or absorber.

Interpretive note: Definitions prefer operational utility over metaphysical certainty; contested terms defer to Site usage if safety is not compromised.

Article III — Governance & Membership (M-codes)

M-01 Council of Sites: Each Site designates a Site Chair (1 vote). Simple majority for guidance; 2/3 for Code changes.

M-02 Committees: Ethics (ETh), Standards (STD), Emergency Response (ER), Archives (ARC). Chairs appointed by Council; terms 2 years.

M-03 Patron-at-Large (Non-Voting): Ceremonial seat recognizing major funders. Current Patron-at-Large: Kellan Morrow (no site authority; requires invitation for on-site presence).

M-04 Conflict of Interest: Personal relationships must be disclosed to Ethics; disclosure is confidential; recusal encouraged where practical.

M-05 Site Recognition: Admission requires 2/3 vote + attestation of minimal safety infrastructure and an Archivist-of-record.

Article IV — Site Sovereignty (S-codes)

S-00 Principle: Sites govern their land. NAVA guidance is advisory, except where a Site opts into a binding compact.

S-07 Local Covenants: Sites may set stricter rules. NAVA recognizes and will not undermine them.

S-12 External Access: No outside team may operate on a Site without the Site Chair’s written consent.

Article V — Roles & Qualifications (Q-codes)

Q-10 Empath: Qualified to operate FESHP; calibrates reads; files comparative notes; may halt reads for contamination/noise.

Q-20 Healer: Treats beings; governs clinical ethics; may request environmental pauses (e.g., buplin throttling) during sessions.

Q-30 Enticer: Activates phenomena; opens/redirects lanes; kept out of treatments and within distance rules declared by clinical/empirical leads.

Q-40 Archivist: Custodian of records (maps, logs, analog/digital media); maintains chain-of-custody.

Article VI — Standards & Protocols (Code Families)

G-series — Gnome Contact Protocols

G-11 Consent-by-Behavior: Approach/treat only if the being lowers resonance or allows proximity. No coercion. Report significant contact to Site Chair within 24h.

G-12 Naming Ethics: No hostile naming around or upon a being. Neutral descriptors only. Violations trigger Ethics review.

G-13 Proximity Windows: Daylight + heat increases cohesion risk; favor dusk/diffuse light. Cameras banned during contact (see R-04).

G-18 Disturbance Differentiation: Lack of feshp positive read does not negate a credible healer sighting.

R-series — Recording & Documentation

R-04 No Cameras During Contact: Recording devices prohibited in active contact/treatment zones. Perimeter cams allowed.

R-02 Perimeter Retention: Security footage retained 30 days minimum; redactions allowed for privacy, not to erase anomalies.

R-06 Archive Ingest: Raw media → Archivist within 72h with time/location notes; no edits.

P-series — Perception Tools (labels, etc.)

P-01 Allowed Tools: Labels on places/objects only; effects are on human attention; no claims of cloaking.

P-03 Placement Log: Each label logged (text, time, location, purpose, duration). Logs are site property.

P-09 Modifications: Device mods permitted if disclosed to Standards; devices must not emit irritants or ultrasonic tones.

L-series — Bridger Loom Regulation

L-00 Definition: Loom = large, field-deployed device to dry/disperse goo.

L-10 Authorization: Deployment requires Site Chair sign-off + notification to NAVA ER within 12h.

L-11 Settings: Aggressive modes near beings discouraged; any adverse effect triggers a mandatory review.

L-15 Post-Use Review: Incident memo filed (within 7 days) to Archives + ER; includes before/after environmental readings.

F-series — FESHP Use

F-01 Operators: Empaths only. Secondary observers allowed without devices.

F-03 Read Conditions: Quiet, controlled light. Enticers ≥50 ft during pivot reads.

F-05 Comparative Logs: Weekly baseline required; emergency reads must include last-baseline comparison.

B-series — Buplin / BUQUE

B-01 Mix: Beach sand base + vortex grass dew layer.

B-04 Operations: Generally on; repositioning is rare, planned, and logged.

B-08 Treatment Buffer: Pause/throttle within treatment perimeter on healer request.

E-series — Emergency Levels

E-1 Advisory: Heightened attention; routine continues with caution.

E-2 Containment: Limit foot traffic; enticers on leash; no public events adjacent to sensitive zones.

E-3 Partial Lockdown: Suspend tours/outreach; designate corridors; notify NAVA ER.

E-4 Intervention: Consider Loom (if site policy allows) or full evacuation protocols.

C-series — Chain of Custody & Reporting

C-02 Reporting Window: Significant contact reported to Site Chair within 24h; Site Chair chooses NAVA escalation.

C-05 Custody: Archivist maintains original media/notes; access via written request; tampering = censure.

C-09 Sovereignty Exception: Sites may withhold local logs from NAVA for up to 30 days unless E-4 is declared.

D-series — Disputes & Discipline

D-01 Mediation: Ethics convenes within 14 days; non-binding recommendations.

D-02 Censure: Council simple majority can censure a Site/practitioner; penalties = program access limits, not land control.

D-07 Review Triggers: Adverse effect on a being; recording violations; hostile naming; undisclosed Loom use.

Article VII — Funding & Patronage

VII.1 NAVA funds cross-site programs (training, archives, outreach). Site operations funded locally.

VII.2 Patron-at-Large (Non-Voting) recognized for philanthropy; cannot operate on any Site without invitation.

VII.3 No earmarks may compel a Site to alter local covenants (e.g., may not condition grants on Loom use).

Article VIII — Public Narrative & Outreach

VIII.1 Avoid panic; prefer educational framing over spectacle.

VIII.2 No public claims about beings without Site Chair concurrence and, where prudent, cross-validation.

VIII.3 Press access is a Site decision. NAVA may issue umbrella statements when cross-site issues arise.

Article IX — Amendments

IX.1 Codes may be amended by 2/3 Council vote; emergency addenda may be issued by ER Chair for 30 days pending ratification.

Appendices

Appendix A — Code Index (quick ref)

G-11 Consent-by-Behavior; G-12 Naming Ethics; G-13 Proximity Windows; G-18 Disturbance ≠ Disproof.

R-02 Perimeter Retention; R-04 No Cameras During Contact; R-06 Archive Ingest.

P-01 Allowed Tools; P-03 Placement Log; P-09 Modifications.

L-00 Definition; L-10 Authorization; L-11 Settings; L-15 Post-Use Review.

F-01 Operators; F-03 Read Conditions; F-05 Comparative Logs.

B-01 Mix; B-04 Operations; B-08 Treatment Buffer.

E-1..E-4 Emergency Levels.

C-02 Reporting; C-05 Custody; C-09 Sovereignty Exception.

D-01 Mediation; D-02 Censure; D-07 Review Triggers.

M-01..M-05 Governance.

S-00, S-07, S-12 Sovereignty & Access.

Q-10, Q-20, Q-30, Q-40 Roles.

Appendix B — Vagaries & Interpretive Notes (selected)

B.v1 “Goo”: Sites may use local synonyms; the Charter avoids metaphysical causation claims. Operational test = sticky residue + sensorable smear on camera in low light.

G.v2 “Consent-by-Behavior”: Examples include reduced thrums, approach without agitation, or tolerance of healer proximity. Healer judgment prevails on-site.

P.v3 “Perception Labels”: Effects are suggestive, not binding. The phrase must be plausible to local context; absurd labels nullify efficacy.

R.v4 “No Cameras During Contact”: Observation changes outcomes. Exceptions require Site Chair + Ethics concurrence; footage remains internal.

L.v5 “Collateral Harm” (Loom): The threshold for “harm” includes cohesion fray and involuntary retreat. Sites must document settings and distance.

S.v6 “Sovereignty”: NAVA cannot compel a Site to adopt Looms or permit outside teams; pressure is reputational and programmatic, not coercive.

Appendix C — Templates

C-T1 Contact Report (24h) — minimal facts, no speculation.

P-T2 Label Placement Log — text/time/location/duration/reason.

L-T3 Loom Use Memo — settings, distance, duration, outcome, review date.

R-T4 Camera Redaction Sheet — who/why/what timestamp.

Drafting notes: This draft encodes what Sites commonly do already. It leaves space for local practice and polite disagreement. Where this Charter is silent, Site custom rules.